Zero Base Budgeting (ZBB)Meaning, Benefits and LimitationsSteps and Pre-Conditions
Zero Base Budgeting
Zero Base Budgeting is a new technique for the
preparation of budgets. It involves fresh evaluation of every item of
expenditure as if it were a new item. It is reconsideration of each item of
expenditure from the very beginning. It is like assuming that a zero
expenditure has been incurred on a project at the time of its review, although
the project may be in existence from a long time and may have involved some
expenditure also. The review is meant to provide a justification or otherwise
of the project as a whole in the light of objectives set for it and priorities
of the society. The procedure is altogether different from the usual procedure
followed in India.
Peter A. Phyrr describes, the concept of zero
base budgeting as an operating, planning and budgeting process that requires
each manager to justify a budget request in detail from scratch…….” It means,
the budget as a whole is considered rather than to examine incremental change
only.
According to Prof. R. A. Musgrave, “the idea
of zero base budgeting is to consider the budget as a whole, rather than to
examine incremental changes only.”
Essentially, the concept of zero base
budgeting is that all the financial requirements of a budget unit are analyzed,
evaluated and justifies annually and not just the increased or additional
requirements. In more practical way, zero base budgeting means the evaluation
and prioritization of all programmes at different levels of effects. To be simpler,
under zero base budgeting, each department ministry is required to justify its
budget requests from the bottom up, evaluating alternative programme packages
and ranking programmes so as to select the best alternative and allocate
resources accordingly. The budget is considered as a whole and a fresh one,
i.e. from zero base.
Benefits and Limitations of Zero Base Budgeting
Zero-base budgeting is revolutionary concept
and is relatively a new management tool for planning and control of activities.
It involves people at all levels in the organization and promotes team sprit. The
plans and budgets based upon ZBB are much improved than shoes based upon
traditional budgeting. There are a number of benefits that arise from zero-base
budgeting. Some of the important advantages of ZBB are enumerated below:
1. Proper Allocation of Funds: It enables
management to allocate funds according to the jurisdictions of the programme.
The priority can be fixed for various activities and their implementation will
be in the same order.
2. It improves Efficiency: Zero-base
budgeting improves efficiency of the management. Every manager will have to
justify the demand for resources. Only those activities will be undertaken
which will have justification and will be essential for the business.
3. Identification of Economical Areas: Zero-base
budgeting will help in identifying economical and wasteful areas. Emphasis will
be given to economical activities and alternative courses of action will also
be studies.
4. Optimum use of Resources: The
management will be able to make optimum use of resources. The expenditures will
be undertaken only when it will have justification. A list of priorities is
prepared and cost-benefit analysis will be the guiding principle in fixing the
priority.
5. Determining of Utility: Zero-base
budgeting will be appropriate for those areas whose output is not related to
production. It becomes difficult to evaluate the performance of those sides
which are not directly related to production but undertaken other activities.
This technique will be helpful in determining the utility of each and every
activity of the business.
6. Useful of Attain organizational Goals: Budgeting
will be related to organizational goals. Something will not be allowed the plea
that it was done in the past. Only those things will be allowed which will help
in realizing organizational goals.
7.
Job
Satisfaction: ZBB ensures greater participation of personnel in formulation and
ranking processes. This helps in
promoting level of job satisfaction and thus resulting in better control and operational
efficiency in the organisation.
8. Applied to priority areas: Zero
base budgeting is a flexible tool that can be applied on a selective basis. It does not have to be applied throughout
the entire organisation or even in all the service
departments. Keeping in view the limitations of time, money and persons available to install, operate and
monitor it the management thus can select priority areas to which zero base budgeting may
be applied.
LIMITATIONS OF ZERO BASE BUDGETING
In spite of many advantages, there are a
number of limitations arising mainly from difficulties in operation of ZBB.
Some of the important limitations are as below:
1)
Bureaucratic and Time Consuming: Though
zero-based budgeting proved to be a useful budgeting process to review
discretionary overheads but the process was so bureaucratic and time consuming
that the organisations got discouraged to use it again. Moreover, like
traditional budgeting, it was based on the organisational hierarchy. It thus
reinforced functional barriers and failed to focus on the opportunities for
improving business processes.
2)
Incorrect Assumptions: Although budgeting
depends on many assumptions as a basis, organisations use the previous year’s
assumption as a basis only. Each assumption has to be determined without
looking at the previous year’s budget. If the assumptions are incorrect, then
the budget will not be accurate and will be of little help to the organisation.
3)
Threat felt by bureaucrats: The major problem
is the threat that many bureaucrats feel towards a process which evaluates the
effectiveness of their programs.
4)
Lacking in Programs: For many programs,
workload and performance measures may be lacking or the cause/effect and
program impact may not be well defined so that the analysis will be less than
perfect.
5)
Based on organisation hierarchy: Like
traditional budgeting, it was based on the organisational hierarchy. It thus
reinforces functional barriers and fails to focus on the opportunities for
improving business processes.
6)
Too much paper work: A major reason for
failure of ZBB has been too much of paper work involved in the process which
was found unmanageable by the organisation concerned. Also, the reviews and
analysis required to be carried out could not be handled within the normal
cycle of the budget process spreads over a few months.
7)
Difficulties in ranking of decisions:
Difficulties in formulation and ranking of decisions packages as every manager
may not have been necessary expertise.
8)
No flexible budgeting: The system of zero base
budgeting has no scope to adjust for the changes and thus, flexible budgeting
is not possible.
TRADITIONAL
BUDGETING Vs. ZERO BASE BUDGETING
Basis |
Traditional
Budgeting |
Zero-Base
Budgeting |
1. Emphasis |
It is more
accounting oriented than decision oriented. Depends upon past data and lays
emphasis on ‘how much’. |
It is decision
oriented lays emphasis on ‘why’. |
2. Approach |
Its approach is
monitoring toward expenditures. |
Its approach is
towards achievement of objectives. |
3. Focus |
Its focus is on
increase or decrease in expenditure over the past. |
Its focus is on
cost benefit analysis. |
4.
Communication |
In traditional
budgeting communication is usually vertical. |
It encourages
communication both vertically and horizontally. |
5. Method |
The method
preparation of the traditional budget is based upon extrapolation. |
Its preparation
is based upon selection of decision package in view of cost-benefit analysis. |
Steps in Zero-Base Budgeting
a)
Objective:
The
objective of budgeting should be determined. When the objective is clear, then
efforts will be made to achieve that objective. Different organizations may
have different objectives. One concern may try to reduce the expenditure on
staff, another may try to discontinue one project in preference to another. So
the first step will decide about the object and then other steps will be
possible.
b)
Decision
for operation: The extent to which zero base budgeting is to be applied should
be decided. Whether it should be used for all operational areas or it should be
applied in some areas only should be decided beforehand.
c)
Decision
Package: The next step in ZBB is developing of ‘decision packages’. A
decision package is “a document that identifies a specific activity in such a
manner that management can evaluate and rank it against other activities
competing for limited resources, and decide whether to approve or disapprove
it.”
d)
Cost and
Benefit: Cost and benefit analysis should be undertaken. We should
consider the cost involved and the likely benefits to accrue. Only those
projects should be taken first where benefit is more as compared to the cost
involved. Cost benefit analysis will help in fixing priority for various
projects on the basis of their utility or ranking of decision packages. It
provides answers to the following questions.
1.
Is it necessary to perform the activity at
all? If the answer is in the negative, there is no need for proceeding further.
2.
How much is the actual cost and what is the
actual benefit of the activity?
3.
What is the estimated cost and estimated
benefit of the activity?
4.
If the unit is dropped, can the unit be
replaced by outside agency?
e)
Preparation of budgets: The
activities and projects for which benefit is more than the cost are ranked. Priority
is accorded to the most profitable projects/activities, in the allocation of
funds.
f)
Selection
and Approval: The final step involved in zero-base budgeting is concerned with
selecting, approving decisions packages and finalizing the budget.
PRE-CONDITIONS OF ZERO BASED BUDGETING (ZBB)
The
introduction of Zero Base Budgeting (ZBB) is not as easy as it appears. It
requires a tremendous paper-work and detailed analysis. Thus, the organization
should be able to provide all information including the cost data necessary for
introducing ZBB. Moreover, the successful implementation of the zero base
budgeting also depends upon the availability acceptability of the concept in
letter and spirit. Obviously, this acceptance would be associated with the
organization where the new system has to be implemented. It is so because any
apathy on the part of the people could lead to a situation in which priorities
relating to the existing schemes may not be assessed accurately. In short, it
requires the following pre-conditions:
1.
Committed Management: The top management must be committed as well as have a
participatory role.
2. Fixed
goals: Organisational goals must be fixed. As ZBB is not an end product itself
but a means to achieve targets, goal setting must not be vague and ambiguous.
3.
Identification of weakness: Weakness of an organisation must be perceived and
strengths enumerated so that identified weak areas can be worked upon.
4. Trained
staff: ZBB requires staff to be trained for its procedures to be implemented
properly.
5.
Elimination of doubts: All levels of management must cooperate with each other
by eliminating all doubts regarding the ZBB procedure.
6. Review:
Decision packages must be reviewed periodically.
7.
Brainstorming Session: There must be brainstorming sessions at all hierarchical
levels to get proper and timely feedback.
Post a Comment
Kindly give your valuable feedback to improve this website.