Public Expenditure and its Effectson Production, Economic Development and Planning
Effects of Public Expenditure
Public expenditure incurred according to the
sound principles of public finance, exerts healthy effects on the entire
economy of a nation. The ultimate effects of public expenditure, in the form of
greater production, more equitable distribution of wealth and all-round
economic development of a country, are always expected to be present, if the
expenditure is incurred after considerable thought and utmost rationality.
Gone are the days when it was advocated that
the state should interfere the least in economic activities and the government
is merely an agent for the people – responsible for the maintenance of justice,
police and army. In those days public expenditure on economic activities was
normally considered a waste. Contrary to this, a new concept of public
expenditure has been developed by the modern economists. Today, public
expenditure is regarded as a means of securing social ends rather than just
being a mere financial mechanism. In present times, Wagner’s Law of Increasing
Public Expenditure – both extensively and intensively, is considered
universally true. The trend of rising public expenditure is not confined to any
particular country, but it is found in almost all countries of the world,
irrespective of its socio-economic and political set-up. Every public
expenditure is considered desirable, when it is not wasteful, but has a
positive effect on production, distribution, consumption and thus maximizes
economic and social welfare of the country as a whole.
Effects of public expenditure can be studied
under the following heads:
a) Effects of
Public Expenditure on Production.
b) Effects of
Public Expenditure on Distribution.
c) Miscellaneous
Effects of Public Expenditure including Consumption.
Effects of
Public Expenditure on Production: While analyzing the effects of public
expenditure, Dalton very correctly said that just as taxation, other things
being equal should reduce production as little as possible, so the public
expenditure should increase it as much as possible. He further added that the
level of production and employment in any country depends upon the following
three factors:
1) Effects Upon the Ability to Work, Save and
Invest: If public expenditure increases the efficiency of a person to
work, It will promote production and national income. Public expenditure on
education, medical services, cheap housing facilities, means of transport and
communications, recreation facilities etc. will increase the efficiency of
persons to work. At the same time, public expenditure can promote saving on the
part of the lower income groups by providing additional income to them, for a
person who has larger income can be normally expected to save a larger amount.
Finally, public expenditure, particularly repayment of public debt will place
additional funds at the disposal of those who can save. Thus, it is evident
that public expenditure can promote ability to work, save and invest and thus
promote production and employment.
2) Effects on Willingness to Work, Save and
Invest: Public expenditure also affects the people’s willingness to work,
save and invest. Pension, provident fund, interest-free loan, free medical aid,
unemployment allowances and other government payments provide security to a
person and, therefore, reduce the willingness of persons to work and save –
after all, why should a person work hard and save when he knows fully he will
be looked after by the government when he is not in a position to earn any
income, i.e. he finds his future fully secured. In the absence of any savings,
the question of investment does not arise at all.
3) Effects on Diversion of Resources: Public
expenditure also affects the diversion of resources. For example, if the
government wishes to attract productive resources to a particular industry, it
will start giving financial assistance from its own funds to such an industry.
In the same way, if the government wishes to attract productive resources to a
particular area or region, it will start giving a variety of incentives in the
form of bounties, subsidies etc. (such as land at concessional rates, cheap
electric supply and water, loans on nominal rates of interest, freedom from
sales tax, income-tax etc. for a certain period, production subsidy etc.) to
the industrialists to achieve this objective.
Effects of
Public Expenditure on distribution: Public expenditure has its effects not
only on production but is also a most powerful weapon in the hands of the
government for bringing about an equitable distribution of wealth. For bringing
about an equitable and just distribution of wealth the government can use not
only its taxation policy but public expenditure policy can also help to a great
extent in achieving this very objective. In fact, the role of taxation and
public expenditure in removing inequalities of income is complementary and
supplementary. If the government intends to minimize the economic inequalities
that existed in the society, it should levy maximum about of taxation on richer
sections of the community, because their taxable capacity is undoubtedly high.
The income so earned through taxation should be spent on providing various
types of facilities, subsidies and amenities to the poorer section of the
community. For example, the state can extend to the poor benefits of old age pensions,
social insurance, free medical aid, cheap housing, interest-free loans,
subsidized food etc. This will automatically bring redistribution of wealth
(national income) in favour of the poorer section of the community. On the
contrary, public expenditure which confers larger benefits to the richer
sections of the community, e.g., subsidies on luxury goods, provision of
subsidized milk, other foodstuff etc. tends to widen the gap of inequalities.
As Dalton puts, “That system of public expenditure is best which has the
strongest tendency to reduce inequalities of income”. Public expenditure has,
thus, an important role in reducing economic inequalities in the community.
Miscellaneous Effects of Public Expenditure:
Effect of
Public Expenditure on Consumption: Public expenditure also affects
consumption. Due to public expenditure the size of consumption tends to
increase in the economy. Since public expenditure tends to redistribute the
income in favour of poor people and their marginal propensity to consume being
high, the overall impact of public expenditure leads to a rapid increase in the
consumption of the economy. Many social goods are provided to the poor sections
of the community for consumption at relatively cheaper rates, e.g. free medical
aid, subsidies foodstuffs (rationing scheme), expenditure on education, public
parks, playgrounds, libraries etc. with the results that the real income of
beneficiaries increases and their capacity to consume, save and invest also
improves.
Effect of
Public Expenditure on Economic Stability: It is an admitted fact that public
expenditure has proved to be a powerful tool for bringing about economic
stability in the country. It is an excellent instrument for regulating and
controlling volume of employment in a country. The government should make a
substantial increase in public expenditure at a time of depression, because
this will help bring about an automatic increase in the volume of employment.
On the contrary, the government brings about a substantial reduction in its
expenditure at a time of boom (inflation), because this will help save the
economy from the adverse effects of inflation. Inflation is a condition when
investment exceeds savings. In this situation the aim of the government should
be to have a surplus budget, i.e. the governments spend less than its revenue.
The funds acquired by means of a surplus budget may be used to provide
additional capital to those sectors of economy which experience shortage of
capital so that the total productive capacity of the economy may increase. The
rising price-level may also be checked by increasing the production of goods
and services leading to control of inflation.
Effect of
Public Expenditure on Economic Growth: There is a close relationship
between public expenditure and economic growth. According to John Adler, a
rising proportion of additional output should be developed to capital
formation, so that the economic growth of an undeveloped country may be speeded
up. For this purpose, twofold change in the government budget is required.
Firstly, the government budget should be raised so that a rising proportion of
the additional output may be available for development purposes. Secondly, a
rising proportion of government revenues should be used to finance expenditure on
development. The basic infrastructural facilities required for economic
development can be provided with the help of public expenditure. In this way,
public expenditure has a significant role to play in the process of economic
growth.
Effects of
Public Expenditure on Employment: Unemployment is the burning problem
in underdeveloped countries, developing countries and now even in developed
countries of the world. Public expenditure can play a vital role in influencing
the level of employment in an economy. According to Prof. J. M. Keynes “The
government should step up its expenditure on public works such as roads,
buildings, canals at the time of depression and unemployment. This will add the
volume of employment in the economy.” On the contrary, the government should
cut down its expenditure to deal with the problem of the shortage of human
resources in a country.
Post a Comment
Kindly give your valuable feedback to improve this website.